Similar names create trouble in prostitution case
|
Retired
sheriff's deputy Paul Main poses in his shop at his home Tuesday, Oct.
16, 2012 in Alfred, Maine. Main's phone has been ringing off the hook
since a person with his same name, accused of visiting a prostitute in
Kennebunk, was released on Monday. |
KENNEBUNK, Maine
(AP) -- Paul Main's quiet evening was shattered by a phone ringing
off the hook and a half-dozen TV crews showing up on his porch. Everyone
wanted to know: Was he the same Paul Main who's been accused of
visiting a prostitute in Kennebunk?
The answer
was no. But a decision to release the names of alleged prostitution
clients without any ages or addresses caused big problems for men who
have the same names as the accused, until a judge deemed more
information should be public.
For weeks,
rumors about a prostitution business have run rampant in this small New
England town best known for its proximity to the Bush family summer
compound in neighboring Kennebunkport.
On
Monday, authorities released the first batch of names out of more than
150 men accused of paying a Zumba fitness instructor for sex.
"I
don't have a problem with releasing names. I think it's a wonderful
thing, but I'll be darned if it's right to do it in a shoddy manner,"
said Main, a retired spokesman and head of the detective division for
the York County Sheriff's Department.
The
addresses, ages and other identifying information of the johns were
withheld after a judge ruled that state law required them to be kept
confidential because the alleged sexual encounters may have been
videotaped, making the men potential victims of privacy invasion.
On
Tuesday, Superior Court Justice Thomas Warren reversed his decision,
ruling in favor of a request from The Portland Press Herald newspaper
that sought the release of the addresses and other information.
Kennebunk
police re-issued the names with the added details. The revised list
included former South Portland Mayor James Soule and suspects from more
than a dozen towns in Maine, as well as one from Boston and another from
New Hampshire. The men ranged in age from 34 to 65 and also included a
lawyer, a forester and a real estate appraiser.
Soule did not return calls to his home and business, and no one answered door at his home.
Before
the extra information was released, the lack of addresses and dates of
birth made it impossible to verify exactly who was among the accused.
Most records released by police and courts have that information.
The
Associated Press declined to distribute the names until the suspects'
precise identities could be confirmed. None of those who have matching
names returned calls.
But many media outlets
released the first list, causing problems for men like Main, whose name
is shared by at least 20 others in Maine alone.
The
town had been awaiting the release of the list since 29-year-old Alexis
Wright was charged this month with engaging in prostitution in her
dance studio and in an office across the street and secretly videotaping
many of her encounters. Police said she kept meticulous records
suggesting the sex acts generated $150,000 over 18 months.
Wright,
from nearby Wells, has pleaded not guilty to 106 counts of prostitution
and other charges. Her business partner also pleaded not guilty to 59
counts.
Police released the first 21 names
Monday evening. The list was then revised to include the men's middle
initials. Main's middle initial was different from the Paul Main who was
listed.
Stephen Schwartz, a Portland lawyer
who represents two of Wright's alleged customers, argued that the names
and addresses of the alleged johns should be kept private.
Warren
declined to keep the names secret but at first agreed with Schwartz's
contention that if persons charged with paying a prostitute are also
possible victims of invasion of privacy, then their addresses should be
confidential under Maine law.
Press Herald
attorney Sigmund Schutz argued Tuesday that releasing only partial
information was unfair to people not on the list.
"The
fact is that by releasing names only, you're getting a lot of false
positives. You're implicating people who may be completely innocent and
simply share the same or similar names with people charged, and that's a
real harm," Schutz told the AP.
In southern
Maine, two TV stations, one daily newspaper and a weekly newspaper
published the list. Several others, including newspapers in Maine's
three largest cities, withheld the names.
Roy
Peter Clark, senior scholar at the Poynter Institute, a Florida-based
journalism think tank, said that just because a name becomes public
doesn't mean news organizations have to race to publish it.
"What
journalistic purpose is served by publishing the name, and how do you
balance that against the harm that may be done to these people, their
families, their children?"
Clark said the situation would be different if the name of a public figure appeared.
"If
the police chief is on the list, if the school superintendent on the
list, I would approach those people directly and try to determine
whether their actions are not just a personal moral failure but climb to
the level of social, public hypocrisy," he said.
The
Kennebunk Police Department plans to release the names of johns who've
received summonses on a bi-weekly activity log, meaning the disclosure
of names could continue until the end of the year. The next batch is due
to be released Oct. 26.
As a former law
enforcement officer, Main said releasing the names helps hold suspects
accountable for their misdeeds. But, he added, other information should
be released as well to protect those whose only connection to the case
is having a common name.
"I don't want to see other people going through the same thing that I've been through," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.